By Janaki Kibe, AHI South Asia Associate
It is difficult to imagine that 60 years ago Singapore had “one of the world’s worst slums” according to the British Housing Committee Report. No sleek high-rise residential towers, no Louis Vuitton boutiques, no Michelin starred restaurants, and certainly no $3.6 million cars selling on its streets.
Instead, over half a million people were living in overcrowded, unhygienic squatter settlements and slums without access to sanitation, water or health facilities. Clusters of Chinese, Malays, and Indians carved up the City along racial and ethnic lines.
So, how did Singapore 2012 shed its notorious image of squalor and poverty and become the face of modernity, affluence, and let’s face it a gum-free nation?
Singapore slums in the 1950s
Much of Singapore’s success can be attributed to its Housing and Development Board (HDB), which was established in 1960 with the mission of providing housing of sound construction and design for lower-income groups at affordable rents, encouraging a property-owning democracy in Singapore and enable home ownership, and creating an inclusive, ethnically integrated nation. Today, about 82% of Singaporeans live in HDB flats.
As Singapore’s sole housing agency, the HDB is unique in its organizational structure, function, and approach to housing. It operates like a single, comprehensive source for housing development and coordinates planning, land acquisition, construction, financing, and policy for housing in Singapore. By centralizing its public housing effort, Singapore has avoided the problems of government silos and fragmentation of duties that are associated with multi-agency implementation. Can you imagine not having to visit 15 different government agencies to get a construction permit? (Or let’s face it, a passport?)
To me, one of the most interesting aspects of the “Singapore Success Model” as I like to call it is the way in which the government uses housing to tackle social issues like segregation and lack of nationhood. While planning tools have often been used to zone out the “wrong” sorts of people, it seems like an anomaly to find a housing policy that makes integration such a priority.
Just Say No to Nimbyism
For any newly formed entity—business, boy band or country—it is important to engender a sense of loyalty and community early on. The HDB saw housing as a means of building nationhood. Beginning in the 1970s, the HDB started allocating new flats in order to give a balanced distribution of races to different new towns. The results were positive and startlingly long-lasting.
A multiracial Singapore
“The Government wanted to achieve this, therefore we intermingled the races by balloting for the HDB flats, and mixing them in schools. The result is more socializing between our communities.” – Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew, Straights Times, 4 March 2011
Building a Nation Brick By Brick
The HDB also emphasized home ownership as a way to cultivate nation building and instill a sense of “nationhood.” To happen, homeownership requires a supply of houses and an affordable housing credit. HDB initiatives eased mortgage financing problems for potential buyers, thereby encouraging renters (including lower-income families) to become homeowners.
One of the key aspects of the public housing program that helped make home ownership accessible to so many Singaporeans was a policy that allowed buyers of public housing to use a portion of their savings in the Central Provident Fund (CPF) to pay for the purchase of their HDB flat. CPF savings can go towards down payments (20% of purchase price) and mortgage payments (remaining 80%, which can be paid in installments through a HDB assisted mortgage loan with below market rate interest rates). CPF savings are essentially accumulated funds from the worker’s pay-as-you-go social security to which both employer and employee make mandatory contributions. Through a culmination of efforts directed towards promoting homeownership, of the 82% of Singaporeans who live in HDB flats nearly 90% of them are home owners.
HDB’s first eco-friendly residential project
And just to prove that public housing does not have to be ugly. (And skyscrapers are not always bad.)
82% of all households living in HDB flats have indicated that they would be content to always live in these flats (Housing and Development Board Survey, 2000).